Monday, September 19, 2016

Whatever, Found-Footage Doesn't Like You Either


Whatever, Found-Footage Doesn't Like You Either:
A Defense of Films Most Unpopular Sub-Genre

This past weekend brought with it the release of the surprise sequel to 1999's The Blair Witch Project, the film that kick started this whole "found-footage" subgenre. The new movie, simply titled Blair Witch, was not only met with poor critical reception but also found itself with a slightly disappointing opening weekend, with a box office of just $9.6 million (the movie cost $5 million, so in retrospect it's not so bad). So we all know what that means right? That means it's time for all the haters to come out of the woodwork to tell everyone how much they hate found-footage and how big of a mistake this new movie was. Only it wasn't a mistake, the movie is phenomenally made and a literal thrill ride in a movie theater. So why all the hate? What is it about this subgenre that the bad overshadows all of the truly fantastic films to come out of this? 


I'm not sure I'll be able to answer 'why' these people are so vile towards this kind of filmmaking but I can at least explain why this kind of attitude is completely unwarranted. If you are someone who gets motion sickness watching shaky cam then this article is not speaking directly towards you, I cannot blame someone for physically not being able to sit through these movies. I am addressing the fans, mostly in the horror community, who enjoy this genre at its best but cry for its death whenever a new film releases. 


Image result for The Blair Witch Project

The world of film is filled with all different kinds of genres and subgenres, some more popular and profitable than others but there is no denying one thing; In any genre of film there are far more bad films than great. This is a general rule with film, there is so much more bad than good out there that we have to be able to cherish it all for what it is. My point? Movie nerds never cry for the death of rom-coms or westerns whenever we get a bad one. So why does it have to be the end of found-footage every time a lackluster film is released?

A large part of this attitude, I believe, comes from the fact that this sub genre hasn't been around nearly as long as others. The pool from which to pick these kinds of movies is only a fraction of the size of most others that have been around almost as long as film itself. This means it is much easier for a fan to claim the amount of good here is far outweighed by the bad, but I strongly disagree. Since just 1999 we have seen a number of truly great films come out of this 'trend' that most moviegoers, including those who bash the genre constantly, would admit to thoroughly enjoying.

Take, for example, 2008's surprise hit Cloverfield which took this style of filmmaking and brought it into the big budget world. I remember when this movie came out, it was a huge deal among most young moviegoers and the secrecy around it make it a small cultural phenomenon. Still to this day I find far more film geeks who love this film than who don't, and for good reason. It was a huge movie made on a tiny scale that allowed us to feel like we were all really there in the city with them. 


Image result for cloverfield 2008

That is a massive component to what makes these films, when done properly, so damn entertaining. Found-footage movies are meant to be an experience, one that feels more real than any other kind of filmmaking. This is what made The Blair Witch Project the most successful film of all-time and I believe it's a large part of what a lot of moviegoers fail to grasp with these stories. In order to get the full enjoyment and experience you need to allow yourself to exist in the world you are seeing and believe what is happening to be true. I'm not saying you have to leave the theater thinking you just watched a documentary, but a small suspension of disbelief can go along way.

There is even more to it than that though, and I believe the other major issue plaguing these movies is one that is effecting the film world as a whole right now. Most moviegoers judge the entirety of the movie universe on what they see in theaters. Now, fifteen years ago this would have been totally justifiable but with the rise of streaming services like Netflix and Hulu, as well as video on demand (VOD) platforms some of the best movies being made these days are seen on your home television. 

If you head over to Netflix right now and browse through the horror section you will find a handful of solid found-footage movies. Take for example 2015's Creep, from filmmaker Patrick Brice and starring the wonderful Mark Duplass. The flick is as simple as can be, made with one camera and two people they get more story and scares packed into 80 minutes than most straight forward horror films these days. Or, if you are like me and get unreasonably creeped out by the elderly then you shouldn't hesitate in popping on The Taking of Deborah Logan. This would-be documentary about alzheimer's quickly turns into truly unnerving piece of paranormal horror. 

Also, and I cannot say this enough, never be afraid to check out what's being made in other countries. Foreign cinema is where some of the most creative and fresh voices in filmmaking are and the found-footage genre is no different. Go seek out the incredible Spanish horror franchise [REC], the first two movies in the franchise deal out some of the best scares in modern horror, period. You could also pop on Netflix and see one of my favorite movies of all-time (no joke) Troll Hunter. This brilliant norwegian film will dish out a few nifty scares but more than anything else it's an absolute blast to watch. Boasting incredible special effects and a wonderfully charming story this could easily be the film to sway your judgment on the medium. 


Image result for troll hunter

I could go on listing the many other found-footage movies that I think are brilliant, but the haters will just retort with the ones that aren't, like The Gallows or Apollo 18. So I guess what I have to say to all of you is that you should take a step, look at the films you love and decide if you really think this kind of storytelling needs to go away. After seeing Blair Witch this past weekend, and with the satirical horror flick Found-Footage 3D coming out at some point in the near future, I am excited about seeing where else this genre can be taken.  

If nothing else, come away from this with the understanding that the found-footage genre is no different than any other form of filmmaking. The bad will always outweigh the good and if we can't truly appreciate the good because of that then why even bother in the first place? There were three bad superhero movies this year but there's no rallying cry for the death of superhero blockbusters that cost $200 million to make. Why then, should a style of filmmaking that is traditionally profitable and that cost so little to make be ostracized for its failures?

The chances of swaying even a fraction of you to my side is pretty much impossible, but at the very least I hope I have convinced even a handful of you to give these kinds of movies another shot. I especially hope to convince some of you to go and give Blair Witch a shot in theaters if you haven't already. It is a wonderfully crafted horror experience and too many are writing it off simply because of the style in which it was made. If this is the hill on which I choose to die than so be it, At least it's defending a bunch of films I really love.


Image result for blair witch 2016

As always, thanks for reading and I am Zach Who Watches Movies. You can find me anytime on twitter @ZachWWMovies, smell ya later!

No comments:

Post a Comment